<h2 id="sigil_toc_id_95">CHAPTER XVIII.</h2>
<h3 id="sigil_toc_id_96">GRAVE QUESTIONS.</h3>
<p>But the projectile had passed the enceinte of Tycho, and Barbicane
and his two companions watched with scrupulous attention the
brilliant rays which the celebrated mountain shed so curiously all
over the horizon.</p>
<p>What was this radiant glory? What geological phenomenon had
designed these ardent beams? This question occupied Barbicane's
mind.</p>
<p>Under his eyes ran in all directions luminous furrows, raised at
the edges and concave in the centre, some twelve miles, others thirty
miles broad. These brilliant trains extended in some places to within
600 miles of Tycho, and seemed to cover, particularly towards the
east, the northeast and the north, the half of the southern
hemisphere. One of these jets extended as far as the circle of
Neander, situated on the 40th meridian. Another by a slight curve
furrowed the Sea of Nectar, breaking against the chain of Pyrenees,
after a circuit of 800 miles. Others, towards the west, covered the
Sea of Clouds and the Sea of Humours with a luminous network. What
was the origin of these sparkling rays, which shone on the plains as
well as on the reliefs, at whatever height they might be? All started
from a common centre, the crater of Tycho. They sprang from him.
Herschel attributed their brilliancy to currents of lava congealed by
the cold; an opinion, however, which has not been generally adopted.
Other astronomers have seen in these inexplicable rays a kind of
<i>moraines</i>, rows of erratic blocks, which had been thrown up at
the period of Tycho's formation.</p>
<p>"And why not?" asked Nicholl of Barbicane, who was relating and
rejecting these different opinions.</p>
<p>"Because the regularity of these luminous lines, and the violence
necessary to carry volcanic matter to such distances, is
inexplicable."</p>
<p>"Eh! by Jove!" replied Michel Ardan, "it seems easy enough to me
to explain the origin of these rays."</p>
<p>"Indeed?" said Barbicane.</p>
<p>"Indeed," continued Michel. "It is enough to say that it is a vast
star, similar to that produced by a ball or a stone thrown at a
square of glass!"</p>
<p>"Well!" replied Barbicane, smiling. "And what hand would be
powerful enough to throw a ball to give such a shock as that?"</p>
<p>"The hand is not necessary," answered Nicholl, not at all
confounded; "and as to the stone, let us suppose it to be a
comet."</p>
<p>"Ah! those much-abused comets!" exclaimed Barbicane. "My brave
Michel, your explanation is not bad; but your comet is useless. The
shock which produced that rent must have come from the inside of the
star. A violent contraction of the lunar crust, while cooling, might
suffice to imprint this gigantic star."</p>
<p>"A contraction! something like a lunar stomach-ache," said Michel
Ardan.</p>
<p>"Besides," added Barbicane, "this opinion is that of an English
savant, Nasmyth, and it seems to me to sufficiently explain the
radiation of these mountains."</p>
<p>"That Nasmyth was no fool!" replied Michel.</p>
<p>Long did the travellers, whom such a sight could never weary,
admire the splendours of Tycho. Their projectile, saturated with
luminous gleams in the double irradiation of sun and moon, must have
appeared like an incandescent globe. They had passed suddenly from
excessive cold to intense heat. Nature was thus preparing them to
become Selenites. Become Selenites! That idea brought up once more
the question of the habitability of the moon. After what they had
seen, could the travellers solve it? Would they decide for or against
it? Michel Ardan persuaded his two friends to form an opinion, and
asked them directly if they thought that men and animals were
represented in the lunar world.</p>
<div class="illus"><ANTIMG alt="Illustration: A VIOLENT CONTRACTION OF THE LUNAR CRUST." id="contraction" src="images/contractions.jpg" /></div>
<div class="caption">A VIOLENT CONTRACTION OF THE LUNAR CRUST.</div>
<p>"I think that we can answer," said Barbicane; "but according to my
idea the question ought not to be put in that form. I ask it to be
put differently."</p>
<p>"Put it your own way," replied Michel.</p>
<p>"Here it is," continued Barbicane. "The problem is a double one,
and requires a double solution. Is the moon <i>habitable?</i> Has the
moon ever been <i>inhabitable?</i>"</p>
<p>"Good!" replied Nicholl. "First let us see whether the moon is
habitable."</p>
<p>"To tell the truth, I know nothing about it," answered Michel.</p>
<p>"And I answer in the negative," continued Barbicane. "In her
actual state, with her surrounding atmosphere certainly very much
reduced, her seas for the most part dried up, her insufficient supply
of water restricted, vegetation, sudden alterations of cold and heat,
her days and nights of 354 hours; the moon does not seem habitable to
me, nor does she seem propitious to animal development, nor
sufficient for the wants of existence as we understand it."</p>
<p>"Agreed," replied Nicholl. "But is not the moon habitable for
creatures differently organized from ourselves?"</p>
<p>"That question is more difficult to answer, but I will try; and I
ask Nicholl if <i>motion</i> appears to him to be a necessary result
of <i>life</i>, whatever be its organization?"</p>
<p>"Without a doubt!" answered Nicholl.</p>
<p>"Then, my worthy companion, I would answer that we have observed
the lunar continent at a distance of 500 yards at most, and that
nothing seemed to us to move on the moon's surface. The presence of
any kind of life would have been betrayed by its attendant marks,
such as divers buildings, and even by ruins. And what have we seen?
Everywhere and always the geological works of nature, never the work
of man. If, then, there exist representatives of the animal kingdom
on the moon, they must have fled to those unfathomable cavities which
the eye cannot reach; which I cannot admit, for they must have left
traces of their passage on those plains which the atmosphere must
cover, however slightly raised it may be. These traces are nowhere
visible. There remains but one hypothesis, that of a living race to
which motion, which is life, is foreign."</p>
<p>"One might as well say, living creatures which do not live,"
replied Michel.</p>
<p>"Just so," said Barbicane, "which for us has no meaning."</p>
<p>"Then we may form our opinion?" said Michel.</p>
<p>"Yes," replied Nicholl.</p>
<p>"Very well," continued Michel Ardan, "the Scientific Commission
assembled in the projectile of the Gun Club, after having founded
their argument on facts recently observed, decide unanimously upon
the question of the habitability of the moon—<i>'No!</i> the moon is
not habitable.'"</p>
<p>This decision was consigned by President Barbicane to his
notebook, where the process of the sitting of the 6th of December may
be seen.</p>
<p>"Now," said Nicholl, "let us attack the second question, an
indispensable complement of the first. I ask the honourable
Commission, if the moon is not habitable, has she ever been
inhabited, Citizen Barbicane?"</p>
<p>"My friends," replied Barbicane, "I did not undertake this journey
in order to form an opinion on the past habitability of our
satellite; but I will add that our personal observations only confirm
me in this opinion. I believe, indeed I affirm, that the moon has
been inhabited by a human race organized like our own; that she has
produced animals anatomically formed like the terrestrial animals;
but I add that these races, human or animal, have had their day, and
are now for ever extinct!"</p>
<p>"Then," asked Michel, "the moon must be older than the earth?"</p>
<p>"No!" said Barbicane decidedly, "but a world which has grown old
quicker, and whose formation and deformation have been more rapid.
Relatively, the organizing force of matter has been much more violent
in the interior of the moon than in the interior of the terrestrial
globe. The actual state of this cracked twisted, and burst disc
abundantly proves this. The moon and the earth were nothing but
gaseous masses originally. These gases have passed into a liquid
state under different influences, and the solid masses have been
formed later. But most certainly our sphere was still gaseous or
liquid, when the moon was solidified by cooling, and had become
habitable."</p>
<p>"I believe it," said Nicholl.</p>
<p>"Then," continued Barbicane, "an atmosphere surrounded it, the
waters contained within this gaseous envelope could not evaporate.
Under the influence of air, water, light, solar heat, and central
heat, vegetation took possession of the continents prepared to
receive it, and certainly life showed itself about this period, for
nature does not expend herself in vain; and a world so wonderfully
formed for habitation must necessarily be inhabited.</p>
<p>"But," said Nicholl, "many phenomena inherent in our satellite
might cramp the expansion of the animal and vegetable kingdom. For
example, its days and nights of 354 hours?"</p>
<p>"At the terrestrial poles they last six months," said Michel.</p>
<p>"An argument of little value, since the poles are not
inhabited."</p>
<p>"Let us observe, my friends," continued Barbicane, "that if in the
actual state of the moon its long nights and long days created
differences of temperature insupportable to organization, it was not
so at the historical period of time. The atmosphere enveloped the
disc with a fluid mantle; vapour deposited itself in the shape of
clouds; this natural screen tempered the ardour of the solar rays,
and retained the nocturnal radiation. Light, like heat, can diffuse
itself in the air; hence an equality between the influences which no
longer exists, now that that atmosphere has almost entirely
disappeared. And now I am going to astonish you."</p>
<p>"Astonish us?" said Michel Ardan.</p>
<p>"I firmly believe that at the period when the moon was inhabited,
the nights and days did not last 354 hours!"</p>
<p>"And why?" asked Nicholl quickly.</p>
<p>"Because most probably then the rotary motion of the moon upon her
axis was not equal to her revolution, an equality which presents each
part of her disc during fifteen days to the action of the solar
rays."</p>
<p>"Granted," replied Nicholl, "but why should not these two motions
have been equal, as they are really so?"</p>
<p>"Because that equality has only been determined by terrestrial
attraction. And who can say that this attraction was powerful enough
to alter the motion of the moon at that period when the earth was
still fluid?"</p>
<p>"Just so," replied Nicholl; "and who can say that the moon has
always been a satellite of the earth?"</p>
<p>"And who can say," exclaimed Michel Ardan, "that the moon did not
exist before the earth?"</p>
<p>Their imaginations carried them away into an indefinite field of
hypothesis. Barbicane sought to restrain them.</p>
<p>"Those speculations are too high," said he; "problems utterly
insoluble. Do not let us enter upon them. Let us only admit the
insufficiency of the primordial attraction; and then by the
inequality of the two motions of rotation and revolution, the days
and nights could have succeeded each other on the moon as they
succeed each other on the earth. Besides, even without these
conditions, life was possible."</p>
<p>"And so," asked Michel Ardan, "humanity has disappeared from the
moon?"</p>
<p>"Yes," replied Barbicane, "after having doubtless remained
persistently for millions of centuries; by degrees the atmosphere
becoming rarefied, the disc became uninhabitable, as the terrestrial
globe will one day become by cooling."</p>
<p>"By cooling?"</p>
<p>"Certainly," replied Barbicane; "as the internal fires became
extinguished, and the incandescent matter concentrated itself, the
lunar crust cooled. By degrees the consequences of these phenomena
showed themselves in the disappearance of organized beings, and by
the disappearance of vegetation. Soon the atmosphere was rarefied,
probably withdrawn by terrestrial attraction; then aerial departure
of respirable air, and disappearance of water by means of
evaporation. At this period the moon becoming uninhabitable, was no
longer inhabited. It was a dead world, such as we see it to-day."</p>
<p>"And you say that the same fate is in store for the earth?"</p>
<p>"Most probably."</p>
<p>"But when?"</p>
<p>"When the cooling of its crust shall have made it
uninhabitable."</p>
<p>"And have they calculated the time which our unfortunate sphere
will take to cool?"</p>
<p>"Certainly."</p>
<p>"And you know these calculations?"</p>
<p>"Perfectly."</p>
<p>"But speak, then, my clumsy savant," exclaimed Michel Ardan, "for
you make me boil with impatience!"</p>
<p>"Very well, my good Michel," replied Barbicane quietly, "we know
what diminution of temperature the earth undergoes in the lapse of a
century. And according to certain calculations, this mean temperature
will, after a period of 400,000 years, be brought down to zero!"</p>
<p>"Four hundred thousand years!" exclaimed Michel. "Ah! I breathe
again. Really I was frightened to hear you; I imagined that we had
not more than 50,000 years to live."</p>
<p>Barbicane and Nicholl could not help laughing at their companion's
uneasiness. Then Nicholl, who wished to end the discussion, put the
second question, which had just been considered again.</p>
<p>"Has the moon been inhabited?" he asked.</p>
<p>The answer was unanimously in the affirmative. But during this
discussion, fruitful in somewhat hazardous theories, the projectile
was rapidly leaving the moon; the lineaments faded away from the
travellers' eyes, mountains were confused in the distance; and of all
the wonderful, strange, and fantastical form of the earth's
satellite, there soon remained nothing but the imperishable
remembrance.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />